Yes, I am aware that the image on the left is not exactly deadly. However, I wanted to balance the photo included in yesterday’s post, Part One of “Have You Committed the 7 Deadly SEO Sins?”. And now, for part two:

4. Using image files as text. Some people have a huge block of text not in the format of text which you can copy and paste (or which the search engines can read), rather, typed in an image editing software and placed on the website as a jpeg file or something. Here’s an example:

You may feel the need to use image files that are really just blocks of text if you need to display them in a stylized font that not everyone has. This has its merits, but you shouldn’t do it too often. And this is why:

First of all, search engines can’t read the text in your image file. They don’t have eyes. You’ll be losing a lot of keyword potential. Secondly, if you display too many blocks of text in stylized fonts, it usually won’t look good on your site design. You’re probably getting a bit too “font happy”. Third, it takes a bit longer to load images than just actual text.

5. Not taking site stats seriously. If you think you should just look at the number of pageviews you’re getting, that’s oversimplifying the purpose of reading site statistics. You need to know where your visitors are coming from, how long they stay, what search engines they use, and the color of their underwear. Well, maybe not the latter.

Looking through your site stats (via something like Google Analytics) gives you an idea of which SEO tactics are effective. Is it detailed blog post titles with keywords that bring in your search engine traffic? Which links bring you the most visitors? And so on. There’s a lot you can learn about your current SEO tactics from just looking at site stats. And if you aren’t even measuring site stats, shame on you.

6. Depending on SEO alone to increase sales. Proper SEO may bring in some traffic, but it won’t guarantee sales. First of all, your site has to look credible, your web copy needs to be persuasive, and there’s also the aspect of pricing – plus the dozens of other factors that contribute to sales.

One of my web design clients keeps emphasizing his need for better SEO, because, as he said, the SEO services we weren’t providing weren’t bringing him sales. I pointed out to him in the very beginning that his site was gonna need more work than just SEO. His major problem is his bad business sense altogether – I’ve clocked in hundreds of hours of consulting with him but he won’t listen to any of my advice. SEO isn’t the be-all and end-all of online business. You have to remember that when you’re thinking about your expectations from your campaign.

7. Not keeping yourself updated with SEO news. SEO is a field that’s constantly changing, especially since search engines keep changing their algorithms, new web trends emerge, etc. Five years ago, social media wasn’t carrying the weight it does now. For an online marketing campaign nowadays, social media is indispensable. You need to factor in all these trends when planning your SEO campaign. Reading SEO related blogs and websites regularly can help you stay updated, so you can adjust your campaign accordingly.

Do you commit any of these SEO sins? Think of other SEO sins you’ve committed? Please share your thoughts in the comments.

Bookmark to:

If you’re not getting any heavenly blessings via rankings, then you’re probably upsetting the big G (Google, but I also mean other major search engines like Yahoo! and MSN). You’re committing some sins that are harmful to your website’s soul. How do you know if your committing these cardinal SEO sins? Then check the following list to find out:

1. Unoptimized Page Titles. This is a simple one. Just because they’re not on the page per se, it doesn’t mean they’re not important. I’m talking about the title tags on your webpage.

For one of my websites, the only change I implemented in my SEO tactics was to re-optimize the page title, and my site jumped from nowhere to the second search engine results page. The point is that you could be spending time obsessing about META keywords and the keyword density of your articles, while the simple, easy-to-implement stuff is overlooked.

You may think it’s a good idea to put your firm’s very vague name as the sole page title. “McFlurry, Geronimo, DeGraw and Associates” doesn’t mean anything to the Average Googler. Instead, be more specific by writing “Certified Public Accountants – McFlurry, Geronimo, DeGraw and Associates”.

Since the page title is just one line of text, you need to put your most important keyword there. Don’t make the title too long either, most search engines only read about 10 words or so of it.

2. Ignoring landing page logic. You do your keyword research and place the same set of keywords for each page on your site. You sign up for a PPC campaign and automatically assume that your homepage should be the landing page. You market every page of your site in exactly the same way. Then, you’re surprised that you’re not having any success.

You know, not all pages are created alike – even if they do wear the same design template. You should have different techniques, keywords, and strategies EACH for your homepage, sales page, product page, etc. This is because each page has a different purpose. Different people with different mindsets need to get to your site in a different way.

For example, Todd is urgently in need of a silver chain and pendant for his girlfriend. He needs it within the week, but he still needs to choose the design. Todd shouldn’t land on your very generic jewelry business homepage. There’s a 10% chance of losing him as a customer every time he needs to take an extra step before the checkout process. Where should Todd land?

On your silver chain and pendant catalogue page. He doesn’t need to go through the homepage to look at the hundreds of jewelry types you offer – he has a rough idea of what he wants. This page should be optimized for “silver chains and pendants”.

On the other hand, Steve knows exactly what he wants, a silver claddagh ring. Where should he land? On the silver claddagh ring product page of course! The one with the “Buy Now” button. The page should be optimized for “silver claddagh ring”.

Find out who will need each page on your site and optimize it for their searching habits. Don’t make your SEO efforts generic. It’s sinful.

3. The absence of backlinks. You believe in “If you build it, they will come.” That’s only true if you’re building a tower of dung and want to attract flies. The same isn’t true for websites.

A site without backlinks is like a nice restaurant in a remote place without any signs pointing to it. Backlinks help bring in visitors to your site from other sites, plus, they “tell” search engines what the most relevant keywords are for your web pages. To use backlinks effectively in your SEO campaign, they need to have the following characteristics:

• They are text links, not image links.
• The anchor text for the links contain an important keyword for you.
• As more sites link to you in a consistent manner, your site will be easier to appear in SERPs for the keyword used in the anchor text.
• Some backlinks have more weight than others, depending on the site they’re on.
• Linkfarms are bad. From a white hat perspective.

This concludes the first part of Smart SEO Blog’s 7 Deadly SEO Sins. Tune in tomorrow for the continuaton of this truly sinful article.

Bookmark to:

Ah, the Black Hat SEO world… something that invokes either a disappointing look or an evil grin.  Still, SEO practitioners – whatever their hat color – must look at black hat techniques from time to time.  Here’s why:

Your competition could be using black hat tips.  If they are, you need to understand their SEO gameplan well if you’re to outwit them.  You can only do that if you’re familiar with black hat seo techniques yourself.  Find out what their strategy is and try to beat them with your own tricks.  Or, you know, you could just report them when you find out (sneaky!).

Black hat tricks give you a better idea of how search engine algorithms work.  This is because black hat SEO practitioners exploit weaknesses in the algorithms, and use it at their own advantage.  This kind of knowledge will prove to be useful when you’re planning your SEO campaign.  Almost everyday, black hats figure out new ways to take shortcuts to the top of SERPs.  If you find out about these shortcuts, you can find a legit way to use them for your own site.

It’s much easier to explain to others what they can/can’t do during their SEO campaigns.  If you’re a web designer or SEO practitioner and your client is saying “I’ve heard something about raising your PR through a 301 redirect…” you need to know what your client is talking about.  A lot of people, especially those new to the SEO world, get a series of bad advice, often black hat in nature.  Knowing these techniques like the back of your hand can help you explain to people the downsides of applying them to their SEO campaign.

Because they make you look marginally cooler.  In other words, if you’re an SEO practitioner, you’d have more credibility if you know all the possible tricks – whether you actually apply them or not.  Although wearing an actual black hat on your head might make it seem like you’re trying too hard.

Bookmark to:

Nowadays SEO has become very popular so that more and more people are becoming aware of the need for an SEO (search engine optimizer/optimization firm) to work on their site. However, if you’ve done any SEO you will know that there will be a lot of times when you’ll actually butt heads with web designers and developers. This is pretty normal since it feels to some that SEOs are not really that effective and actually not needed. If communication is properly done though, it will actually yield very good results for your client.

So how can you figure out a way to make things work between the three specialists?

First of all the actual job description should be clear for all three. That means that web designers will do the designing (the look, format and feel), the web developers will do the coding, and the SEOs will give recommendations before and after the coding to ensure that everything is optimized (from copywriting to back end code). As SEOs though you need to know your boundaries and when asking for help from a developer to insert some function it would be best to leave the actual coding to them. It’s their job and they’ll probably come up with a more elegant code than you! So as long as you get the results you want and get all your tracking data then leave the rest to them. You don’t want them telling you how to do your job and they sure don’t want you to tell them how to do theirs.

In cases when a suggestion is made to you, them listen and welcome them if it makes sense because in the end it is not about who doing the best job but if all three are doing the best job TOGETHER for the client.

Bookmark to:

When it comes to choosing your site URL you’d better make the right choice because it definitely has a significant effect not only one your website SEO but also on user-friendliness.

To make things clear right off the bat let me state that you should use STATIC URLS.

Static URLs have clear advantages over dynamic URLs but before I point out the differences let me make it clear that Google can crawl both URLs even though they also do recommend the use of static URLs.

So why are static URLs preferable over dynamic URLs? Because according to a post in SEOmoz static URLS have the following advantages:

• Higher click-through rates in the SERPs, emails, web pages, etc.
• Higher keyword prominence and relevancy
• Easier to copy, paste and share on or offline
• Easy to remember and thus, usable in branding and offline media
• Creates an accurate expectation from users of what they’re about to see on the page
• Can be made to contain good anchor text to help the page rank higher when linked-to directly in URL format
• All 4 of the major search engines (and plenty of minor engines) generally handle static URLs more easily than dynamic ones, particularly if there are multiple parameters

Note though that according to Google if you already use a dynamic URL it is best to leave it alone since re-writing it just to make it look like a static URL can lead to more problems. As their search quality team said, “If you transform your dynamic URL to make it look static you should be aware that we might not be able to interpret the information correctly in all cases. If you want to serve a static equivalent of your site, you might want to consider transforming the underlying content by serving a replacement which is truly static…However, if you’re using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good.”

Bookmark to:

Last month I wrote a post on pagerank sculpting (See “Pagerank Sculpting: Not Worth Your Time”) after reading Matt Cutts’ explanation on why there are other things you should focus on. One of the most common ways pagerank sculpting is done is to use the “no follow” tag. Because of this, the use of “no follow” tags is less important. Furthermore, in a recent post by Eric Enge of Search Engine Watch he explained why the use of “no follow” tags can, not only be of no help, but actually even harmful in terms of link juice.

In Eric Enge’s post, “Should You Still Use Nofollow?”, he explained that the link juice that is supposed to go to links with “no follow” tags are not split between the remaining links with out the tag but are discarded. This means that it lessens the overall value that a page passes. Due to this, and the fact that pagerank sculpting is a waste of time, it seems that the “no follow” tag’s days are over for SEOs. However, note that you should still remember to use the “no follow” tag for paid links (See my post “Google Says Use No Follow for Paid Posts or Else…”). It pays to preserve the value of your links but not at the expense of being tagged by Google as a violator of their paid links guidelines.

Bookmark to:

“Double U what?” was the most common answer I got when I posed this question to some friends who are also casual bloggers. I then realized that not everyone pays attention to W3C anymore – especially those who are relatively new to the Internet game. I was once again reminded of W3C when I read Ann Smarty’s post on the topic.

So what is W3C exactly? She explains it as:

The World Wide Web Consortium working to develop open standards for the World Wide Web (abbreviated WWW or W3) so that Web documents can be consistently displayed across all platforms.

Founded in 1994 the consortium is still the main web standard against which all websites are evaluated. The most well known W3C tool is Markup Validation Service that checks the markup validity of Web documents in HTML, XHTML, SMIL, MathML, etc. Other valuable tools include RSS/Atom feed validator or CSS validator, Mobile content checker, and broken link checker.

So if it is a standard, does it mean that it is most updated? Unfortunately, technology seems to be developing too fast for W3C and this may not be the case. Ann Smarty further writes:

• many of the standards are too old and are based on the last century realia (e.g. according to W3C any page limit is twenty kilobytes which is not necessary to conform to with today’s high-speed Internet connections);
• the market is moving many times faster than the W3C committee (e.g. mobile Internet which evolves too fast for both W3C and Google to compile).

So should you check your web site if it is W3C compliant? I suggest that since it is still considered the main standard, you might as well. However, do not be content with merely being W3C compliant. Do take a look at other trends and see how your web site can be improved.

Bookmark to:

Just recently, one of my blogger friends asked me again about how to remove the no-follow attribute in her blog comments. She read about the “do follow” movement and wanted to be part of that. That got me to reading up on new developments with regard to no follow and do follow…

I found an interesting article at Econsultancy, which promotes the use of the no follow attribute as part of your SEO best practices. Naturally, being a do follow enthusiast, I had to read the whole article in an effort to understand the rationale behind the statement. This is what I found out:

While the concept of ‘PageRank leak’ – the idea that you can potentially ‘dilute’ your PageRank by linking out too much – has been widely debated for years, there’s no doubt that good linking practices are important to maintaining PageRank.

Linking to third party websites that Google thinks are ’spammy’ can harm you. As Google itself advises, “avoid links to web spammers or ‘bad neighborhoods’ on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.”

This is where using the ‘nofollow’ attribute on outbound links can be a valuable SEO tool.

One of my personal blogs has had no PR for months now – after having a halfway decent PR of 3. Perhaps I am leaking out PageRank because of not using the no follow attribute. I should take a look into this. Maybe you should, too.

Bookmark to:

Admit it or not, there are some aspects in SEO that can be classified as traditional.  These are the practices that have been established from the beginning and are considered to be the building blocks of all SEO activities. These are ideas which have withstood the test of time and that everyone takes for granted to be the “ultimate truth.”

Take the use of keywords for one.  We all know that in order to optimize our web sites, we need to choose those keywords which most people are using when they search for information.  For a certain niche, there is a group of words or phrases that are most commonly employed by people who want to find out more about that niche.  And these are the words that we want to use most in our web sites in order to rank well in the search engine results.

Now how about if we diverge a bit from that traditional way of thinking?  Let us say that we try to use other keywords which may not be as popular?  Non-traditional indeed but it just might give good results in the long run.  Come to think of it, this concept is not that new.  We have heard of the argument which pits short-tail keywords and long-tail keywords against each other so many times.  In essence, using the not so popular keywords mean using long-tail keywords, right?

Experts say that SEO is going to enjoy a modest boost in 2009.  Perhaps it is time to be part of that success and try other less common methods – such as using less popular keywords.  What do you think?

Bookmark to:

As many other people have noticed, sometimes, SEO efforts can tend to become too focused on search engines. Though obviously, the search engines should be a prime consideration, we cannot totally discount the importance of the end users – human users. This is what user experience is all about.

In SEO parlance, user experience is also dubbed as UE or UX. To be honest, I only came across this term recently, thanks to Shari Thurow at Search Engine Land. In a post published yesterday, she shares her thoughts on UX:

Search engine optimization is all about the user experience, because the idea behind SEO is to get users to their desired information and destination(s) as quickly and easily as possible by using the users’ language (keywords). Searchers type in keywords at a commercial web search engine. Searchers’ expectations are validated in search results pages and, hopefully, after they click on links within those search results…a perfect, seamless user experience.

An important point that we should put under consideration is the difference between UX and the perceived UX, the former being what human users actually experience and the latter being what SEO experts may think their users want to experience. Though sometimes, these two factors jive, more often than not, there is a disparity. That is why it is important that when working on SEO, you have to bear in mind UX – the real deal. Do not be limited by your own perceptions, actually open your mind to reality and adjust your strategies accordingly.

Bookmark to: