I never really thought about it, but it seems that you can fake PageRanks.  Now why would you want to do that?  I can think of many different reasons but here is one of the most pressing ones.

I am sure that you have heard of people buying up domains and the reselling them for greater value later on down the road.  These people are speculators, always on the look out for potential money makers.  It is actually brilliant but not always a good thing for those who would need the domains later on.

Anyhow, one of the most important factors that domain buyers take into consideration is the current PageRank of the domain.  If you have ever tried buying an existing domain, you would understand that one of the main reasons you would want to do so is that the PR is already decent.  It would save you months of work and money as opposed to starting from scratch.

It makes perfect sense – unless the PR is fake.  Yup, there are ways and means by which people can make the PR look good when in reality, there is no PR.  Since that is not a matter of importance to us – creating fake PR – let’s not dwell on it.  Instead, let us see how we can determine if the PR is legit.

I do not have much experience in this matter but I ran across a Fake PageRank checker tool.  The URL is http://www.seologs.com/pr-check/pagerank.html.  You can try it out yourself.

Do you know of any other way to determine the legitimacy of PR?

Bookmark to:

A question that has been hovering in my mind, and probably many others, since Google’s Realtime Search was launched is just how realtime it is. Obviously Google’s real-time folks are even more interested in the answer than I am and, according to Matt Cutts, here is what they found out after the Haiti earthquake:

Realtime search triggered in under two minutes from the earthquake happening and within a minute of the first tweets appearing.

Not bad. Apparently though for some people it took as much as six minutes for the realtime search to reflect the news. Gasp! That’s so long! Seriously though, I still find myself sometimes amazed at how far search technology (and technology in general) has gone. Before we had to wait hours to get live news from TV crews or via the radio but now all that one has to do is wait for tweets or do real-time search.

Google was pretty happy to give themselves a pat at the back, though of course Twitter is still the ultimate when it comes to real-time news. My point though is not to praise Google and Twitter but to emphasize the importance of posting things ASAP.

With the arrival of real-time search, freshness of results have become even more important, and REGULAR FRESH results even more so. If you want to have more opportunity to be searchable then post on current newsmakers and post them as soon as they happen.

Bookmark to:

Google has confirmed that the PageRank distribution feature has been removed from the Webmasters Tool. According to Susan Moskwa of Google they removed the feature because they realized that offering such a feature and giving webmaster all over the world advice not to sweat over the pagerank is contradictory. In her answer to a question in Websmaster Central she said, “We’ve been telling people for a long time that they shouldn’t focus on PageRank so much; many site owners seem to think it’s the most important metric for them to track, which is simply not true. We removed it because we felt it was silly to tell people not to think about it, but then to show them the data, implying that they should look at it.”

The funny thing is that here at even here at Smartpagerank we know that using pagerank as a metric to assess your website or blog’s actual SERPs ranking in Google is no longer smart. What to do? Just look at your actual ranking in search engine results pages and try to work your way to the first page and then to the top results.

Here’s sound advice on what to do from Steve of StraightUpSearch.

So then what should PageRank be used for?
Well, why don’t we start with what it should NOT be used for. PageRank should not be an indicator of SEO success. In fact, if I were a site owner that was paying an outside vendor to improve my organic visibility, I would care less about PageRank. Instead, I’d be focused on whether or not my underlying objectives were being hit, either relative to traffic (branding), site conversions, sales, ROI, etc., and that they were being achieved through best practices.

Remember STOP obsessing about pagerank and focus on metrics that really reflect whether you are on the way to achieving your goals.

Bookmark to:

Google has Page Rank and Bing has its Page Score.

So just what is Page Score all about? According to Bing’s Webmaster Center Help the Page Score:

Provides a measurement of how authoritative Bing views your webpage to be, with five green boxes being the highest rating and five empty boxes being the lowest. This is based on many of the same factors Bing uses to determine static rank, but isn’t directly comparable.

Just in case the static rank part adds to the confusion static rank is defined by Bing as:

A query-independent ranking of a webpage by a search engine. The static rank of a webpage provides a general indicator to the overall quality of the webpage.

So basically the Page Score, like the Page Rank, is something useful to keep an eye on but not something you should obsess about because in the end it is still your site’s actual rank in SERPs that matter more. As Brett Yount, Program Manager of Bing Webmaster Center, said, “Note that this [page] score is only relevant to your site and does not track well in our index.”

To know your page site’s page score just sign up at Bing’s Webmaster Center, add your site, and check out the site’s status on Summary Tool. Other things you’ll be able to see using the summary tool would be the last time your site was crawled, the site’s domain score, indexed pages, blocked pages, etc.

Bookmark to:

Panicked the last time you saw the toolbar PR go gray? Don’t worry too much about what you might have done wrong because until now what the graybar really exactly means is still unclear. According to Ann Smarty of Search Enging Journal though some of the things that we do know about the graybar includes the following facts:

Whatever the graybar really does mean Google still hasn’t cleared it up but what’s important is that if you do see the TBPR turn gray just do a quick review on the latest changes you’ve made to your site and assess whether some of the tactics you’ve employed are questionable. Check the usual things that could have gone wrong like being hacked/spammed. If everything’s as it should be then there’s no reason to panic, more likely than not the TBPR will eventually just go back to showing your old PR. We all know that Google constantly tweaks its algorithm so you’ll just have to ride out the changes they might have made.

Bookmark to:

Seo Roundtable recently did a poll on “artificial pagerank” and found out that 54% of the 153 SEOs that participated in the survey do believe in its existence. But what is artificial pagerank exactly?

Artificial pagerank is simply a boost in pagerank given by Google to pages to certain pages that do not seem to merit the high ranking due to the (few) number of links. SEO Roundtable became interested in finding out people’s opinion about the issue due to a discussion in Webmasterworld where someone reported having a website that had a PR jump from 4 to 5 even with only one low value inbound link (PR 0). Interestingly other SEOs have come across the same thing with some other pages. Of course, this lead to different theories pointing to the possible reasons for increase in PR including a faulty PR toolbar, Google not showing all incoming links, etc. What stuck the most, since they did make sense are these two replies:

Tedster: My assumption is that this unusual PR boost is one of the ways that Google helps “mom and pop” sites compete – something that Matt Cutts made a side comment about on his blog a few years ago. He never said WHAT Google does specifically, only that they do a few things. Now if we only knew how they identify a “mom and pop”, eh?

Ankit Maheshwari: Was thinking that Google might have started to give higher PR on local parameters. So in place of calculating the importance of a page globally, it has started doing it region-wise. IMO, this might be the next big change that Google might be testing, i.e to have higher PR sites within Geo-specific niches as well that might not be linked by million other sites, however within there niche/region/location are linked by most.

Bookmark to:

Learn a lesson from big brands. That’s how I view the recent changes in Google’s ranking algorithm that resulted in more branded sites appearing among the top results in Google’s SERPs.

Though it might appear that Google is biased towards branding the good performance of these sites carrying brands is actually the result of the quality of the site’s content. After all they are the pages that are able to deliver the search users the results that they need, and Google is all about giving users the best results possible. As Matt Cutts said in his You Tube video, “I don’t think of it as putting more weight on brands. We really don’t think about ‘brands’ in Search Quality that much. It’s not that we try to always return brands. We try to return whatever we think the best results are for users…we think a lot about trust, reputation, authority, PageRank.” It just so happens that creating a brand is also about the same things: trust, reputation and authority. Established brands even before they went online already tackled the three issues to get where they are. This is what you should do and the pagerank will follow.

Bookmark to:

Just recently, one of my blogger friends asked me again about how to remove the no-follow attribute in her blog comments. She read about the “do follow” movement and wanted to be part of that. That got me to reading up on new developments with regard to no follow and do follow…

I found an interesting article at Econsultancy, which promotes the use of the no follow attribute as part of your SEO best practices. Naturally, being a do follow enthusiast, I had to read the whole article in an effort to understand the rationale behind the statement. This is what I found out:

While the concept of ‘PageRank leak’ – the idea that you can potentially ‘dilute’ your PageRank by linking out too much – has been widely debated for years, there’s no doubt that good linking practices are important to maintaining PageRank.

Linking to third party websites that Google thinks are ’spammy’ can harm you. As Google itself advises, “avoid links to web spammers or ‘bad neighborhoods’ on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.”

This is where using the ‘nofollow’ attribute on outbound links can be a valuable SEO tool.

One of my personal blogs has had no PR for months now – after having a halfway decent PR of 3. Perhaps I am leaking out PageRank because of not using the no follow attribute. I should take a look into this. Maybe you should, too.

Bookmark to:

Did you like those two simple SEO tips from Richard Burckhardt? Well, there is a lot more where they came from. I hope I can share more than two tips in this post – we’ll see.

Don’t be obsessed with PageRank. It is just one isty bitsy part of the ranking algorithm. A site with lower PR can actually outrank one with a higher PR.

This one I really have to internalize. I know, in theory, that there is more to life than PR. However, it is hard when you see your already not-so-good PR of 3 slip down to a worse 2. Still, I think that this tip is a good reminder – let’s not be so focused on PR. It is not everything!

If your site content doesn’t change often, your site needs a blog because search spiders like fresh text. Blog at least three time a week with good, fresh content to feed those little crawlers.

Search engines like unique content that is also quality content. There can be a difference between unique content and quality content. Make sure your content is both.

Here it is again – content. If your web site is not the kind that needs new content on a regular basis, there is always blogging to help.

SEO is not a one-shot process. The search landscape changes daily, so expect to work on your optimization daily.

This is another good reminder. SEO takes time, it is not a one shot deal.

Bookmark to:

In my quest to learn more about optimizing blogs and web sites, I have noticed many recurring patterns.  One of them is the idea of buying links.  I have received lots of advertisements offering thousands of links for less than a hundred dollars.

On the surface, the idea seems to be a very good one.  You only need to shell out a relatively small amount of money and you will get a lot of links just like that.  You do not have to surf, you do not have to network.  Then again, if something seems too good to be true, it probably is, right?

In this case, the “too good to be true” part is highlighted mainly because of how Google treats paid links:

This is in violation of Google’s webmaster guidelines and can negatively impact your site’s ranking in search results.

Examples of link schemes can include:
•    Links intended to manipulate PageRank
•    Links to web spammers or bad neighborhoods on the web
•    Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging (“Link to me and I’ll link to you.”)
•    Buying or selling links that pass PageRank

Take note of that last point.  Google does frown upon this practice.  More so, Google looks not only on the quantity of links but on the quality as well.

Have you been tempted to purchase one of those link schemes where they guarantee a thousand links for $50?  If so, then you might want to think about it.  It might not be worth it in the end – especially if Google finds out and penalizes your site.

Bookmark to: