<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Says Use No Follow for Paid Posts or Else&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2009/03/10/google-says-use-no-follow-for-paid-posts-or-else/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2009/03/10/google-says-use-no-follow-for-paid-posts-or-else/</link>
	<description>PageRank, SEO, Alexa, Google, Optimization, SEM, ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New Use (or non-use) of the &#8220;No Follow&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2009/03/10/google-says-use-no-follow-for-paid-posts-or-else/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New Use (or non-use) of the &#8220;No Follow&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartpagerank.com/?p=374#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>[...] note that you should still remember to use the “no follow” tag for paid links (See my post “Google Says Use No Follow for Paid Posts or Else…”). It pays to preserve the value of your links but not at the expense of being tagged by Google as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] note that you should still remember to use the “no follow” tag for paid links (See my post “Google Says Use No Follow for Paid Posts or Else…”). It pays to preserve the value of your links but not at the expense of being tagged by Google as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2009/03/10/google-says-use-no-follow-for-paid-posts-or-else/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartpagerank.com/?p=374#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>Damn the G-Dictatorship. They should rank in a better way, not force publishers to mess about with code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn the G-Dictatorship. They should rank in a better way, not force publishers to mess about with code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Blogging &#187; &#187; Careful with the Paid Posts</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2009/03/10/google-says-use-no-follow-for-paid-posts-or-else/comment-page-1/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Blogging &#187; &#187; Careful with the Paid Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartpagerank.com/?p=374#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>[...] but when you advertise anything on your blog you should always be careful not to offend Google. In Noemi’s post early this month she explained why bloggers that rely on paid posts for revenue should be very careful about using [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but when you advertise anything on your blog you should always be careful not to offend Google. In Noemi’s post early this month she explained why bloggers that rely on paid posts for revenue should be very careful about using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

