<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google’s SEO Starter Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2008/11/14/google%e2%80%99s-seo-starter-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2008/11/14/google%e2%80%99s-seo-starter-guide/</link>
	<description>PageRank, SEO, Alexa, Google, Optimization, SEM, ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Stratagem</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2008/11/14/google%e2%80%99s-seo-starter-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Stratagem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartpagerank.com/?p=321#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>Is the website Good? 
This might sounds like a funny thing to say as a guideline, but I think it bears mentioning. An economical SEO firm can’t do SEO for a website that comprises just a few pages of flash, or a few pictures embedded into 3-4 pages. SEO is a major commitment. Before you start SEO, you need to have a professional looking site on a stable server. Without this, the  economical SEO firm is not going to give you the results you desire. 
From now on, I think that  traditional SEO will get into the top 10 on Google. But, to get to #1 for a popular search phrase, you will need to painstakingly keep improving and editing your website until you have really low bounce rates. My SEO guideline is that you need to make sure that when people get to your website, they find what they’re looking for. I reached this conclusion after reading about personalized search. I think personalized search will be of great concern to many SEO companies. Personally, I think “personalized search” is the holy grail of algorithms to rank websites. It’s virtually impossible to fool and will continue to change the SEO industry. 
If you&#039;re looking for a good introduction to SEO guideline, check this one out. http://www.bergstrom-seo.com/resources/google-search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf. It was written by google, and it&#039;s really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the website Good?<br />
This might sounds like a funny thing to say as a guideline, but I think it bears mentioning. An economical SEO firm can’t do SEO for a website that comprises just a few pages of flash, or a few pictures embedded into 3-4 pages. SEO is a major commitment. Before you start SEO, you need to have a professional looking site on a stable server. Without this, the  economical SEO firm is not going to give you the results you desire.<br />
From now on, I think that  traditional SEO will get into the top 10 on Google. But, to get to #1 for a popular search phrase, you will need to painstakingly keep improving and editing your website until you have really low bounce rates. My SEO guideline is that you need to make sure that when people get to your website, they find what they’re looking for. I reached this conclusion after reading about personalized search. I think personalized search will be of great concern to many SEO companies. Personally, I think “personalized search” is the holy grail of algorithms to rank websites. It’s virtually impossible to fool and will continue to change the SEO industry.<br />
If you&#8217;re looking for a good introduction to SEO guideline, check this one out. <a href="http://www.bergstrom-seo.com/resources/google-search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.bergstrom-seo.com/resources/google-search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf</a>. It was written by google, and it&#8217;s really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Blogging &#187; &#187; If Not PageRank, Then What?</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2008/11/14/google%e2%80%99s-seo-starter-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Blogging &#187; &#187; If Not PageRank, Then What?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartpagerank.com/?p=321#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>[...] in the last two posts when I talked about Google PageRank not being the end all be all of your SEO efforts. Trust me, I am not merely sour graping – I have been quite open about the PageRank of some of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the last two posts when I talked about Google PageRank not being the end all be all of your SEO efforts. Trust me, I am not merely sour graping – I have been quite open about the PageRank of some of my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://blog.smartpagerank.com/2008/11/14/google%e2%80%99s-seo-starter-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.smartpagerank.com/?p=321#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>I had a quick look at it and, yes, it is a good basic overview.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a quick look at it and, yes, it is a good basic overview.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
